Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt is on shaky ground, with a number of controversies swirling around him.
Here’s a run-down of the trouble Mr Pruitt is facing, how he’s explaining them and exactly how much hot water he is in.
The bargain room for rent
For $50 a night, a Washington tourist might be lucky to get bare-bones accommodation in a seedy motel in a distant suburb. For that same amount, however, Mr Pruitt landed a room for six months last year in a furnished townhouse just a few blocks from the US Capitol.
He only paid for nights he stayed there, and his daughter – who was working as a White House intern – had her own room (with no indication of what, if anything, she paid).
The house is owned by the wife of an energy industry lobbyist, and while Mr Pruitt has insisted that there was no potential conflict of interest, that does not appear to be the case.
Mr Pruitt points to an EPA ethics review that approved his lease, but several agency employees involved have since said they were not given all the relevant information.
Hot water temperature: Boiling. Accepting below-market-rate housing from a deep-pocketed Washington lobbyist with business before your agency? It doesn’t get much swampier than that.
Sirens to clear the traffic
Early in Mr Pruitt’s tenure as EPA chief, he reportedly requested that his motorcade use flashing lights and police sirens to speed trips through Washington-area traffic when he was late for official meetings or rushing to the airport for a flight.
In at least one instance, according to the New York Times, he used it to speed to dinner at a trendy French restaurant.
Per multiple media accounts, the head of Mr Pruitt’s protective detail – a 16-year-veteran of the EPA – objected to the use of the sirens and was subsequently reassigned within the agency.
Agency officials have denied that Mr Pruitt requested the sirens or that their use deviated from government guidelines.
Water temperature: Simmering. In the vast scheme of things this is a relatively minor issue, but demanding traffic-halting motorcades to chic French bistros is the kind of tidbit that can capture the public’s attention.
The travel budget
In his first year as EPA administrator, Mr Pruitt spent more than $168,000 on air travel across the US, including frequent trips to his home state of Oklahoma and several international journeys. He often relied on charter jet service or first-class commercial airline seats because, per the agency, security concerns prevented him from mingling with the masses in coach.
Mr Pruitt spent $36,000 for a military flight from Cincinnati to New York so he could catch a first-class flight to Italy, where he met with foreign leaders and took a private tour of the Vatican.
An EPA spokesperson told the Washington Post that Mr Pruitt’s travels have all been approved by the agency and were needed to spread the administration’s message and hear “directly from people affected by EPA’s regulatory overreach”.
Fox News’ Lukas Mikelionis notes that previous EPA administrators have spent similar figures on their foreign trips, when factoring in higher costs for Mr Pruitt’s round-the-clock security.
Water temperature: Toasty. Extensive use of first-class and charter travel was enough to force Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price out of his job last year, but travel-scandal fatigue may be setting in. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke has faced similar allegations and seems secure in his job.
Then there are some rather unusual purchases the EPA has made under Mr Pruitt’s tenure. His office spent $5,800 on thumb-print security locks and $43,000 for a soundproof phone booth. There was a proposal for $70,000 to replace two desks in his office suit, including one that was bulletproof. In the end, however, the EPA ended up spending $2,000 to refurbish an antique oversize desk for Mr Pruitt that was being stored in a government warehouse.
Water temperature: Tepid. Nothing is going to top Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson’s since cancelled purchase of a $30,000 dining set for his office, although bulletproof desks and soundproof communications stations do reveal a bit of an obsession with security.
Mr Pruitt’s first security head wasn’t the only senior EPA officials moved to different duties once the new administrator arrived.
Per the New York Times, at least five officials – including one veteran of the Trump presidential campaign – were “reassigned or demoted” or otherwise moved after they questioned the agency’s “spending and management” under Mr Pruitt.
It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that career EPA employees have been uncomfortable under the direction of a man who had railed against the agency – and filed lawsuits challenging its actions – prior to taking the helm.
Water temperature: Luke-warm. Personality clashes are inevitable, and it’s difficult to determine whether these moves are because of legitimate policy differences or retribution for attempts to prevent wasteful spending and abuse of power.
Two political appointees who followed Mr Pruitt to the EPA from Oklahoma were given sizeable pay boosts, apparently over the objection of the White House.
The EPA used a provision of a clean-drinking-water law to supplement the salaries of the aides – to the tune of $57,000 in one case and $28,000 in another – after the White House had rejected a direct request for a salary increase.
According to The Atlantic magazine, the move angered long-time EPA staffers, who viewed it as a misuse of money allocated by law for hiring scientific and engineering professionals
In a testy interview with Fox News this week, Mr Pruitt said he only recently learned of the pay boosts for his two close aides and have ordered that they be rescinded. The Washington Post, however, cites EPA officials on background saying the administrator authorised the moves himself.
Water temperature: Steaming. This one probably won’t make much of a dent in public opinion, but the folks in the White House certainly won’t be happy about Mr Pruitt flouting their directives.
Mr Pruitt has reportedly been angling for a chance to rise above his current EPA station, potentially seeking to be the next US attorney general if Jeff Sessions, who has fallen into disfavour with the president, were to get the axe.
The rumours were growing thick enough that the president felt compelled to debunk them himself in a Friday morning tweet.
The former Oklahoma attorney general may also have an eye toward his home state, which could explain his frequent visits. There’s a governor’s election there this November, and the former attorney general would rocket to the front of the pack if he threw his hat in the ring.
Water temperature: Cool. Aspirations for higher office are hardly scandalous in Washington, although furtively lobbying for jobs that are currently filled – even when the current occupant is the oft-beleaguered Sessions – is a bit unseemly.
So, will he survive?
According to the Wall Street Journal, White House Chief-of-Staff John Kelly is convinced Mr Pruitt has to go – and soon.
If you believe President Donald Trump’s tweets, however, the environment chief is doing a great job (but is “TOTALLY under siege”).
Over the first 14 months of the Trump administration, a variety of Cabinet-level officials have been beset, and sometimes felled, by a variety of scandals.
Mr Pruitt seems determined to touch on them all – and come through on the other side still standing.
He’s well-liked by conservatives who admire his deregulatory zeal, and Washington Republicans may be loath to have a fourth high-profile administration job that requires Senate confirmation open up this year.
We’ll see, as the president likes to say…